Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In Canada, the state has a history of regulating sexuality that has privileged white, heterosexual, upper-class citizens. This chapter examines the history of sexual regulation through law and policy in Canada, recognizing the ways that it has reinforced and challenged norms of sexuality, and how this regulation differs according to class status, race and ethnicity, nationality, citizenship status, and other identities. The chapter provides perspective on how this history shapes the ways that sexuality is regulated today through laws, policies, and institutions that determine who is included and excluded from various social protections and benefits. It begins by addressing regulation of sexuality through the norms of marriage and family. Next, it turns to how the Canadian welfare state has regulated sexual norms, and how reproductive healthcare is institutionalized in ways that both protect and discriminate. Finally, the chapter turns to the regulation of sex work and discrimination against LGBTQ2SIA+ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer, questioning, Two-Spirit, intersex, asexual, and anyone else that identifies as a gender or sexuality other than cisgender male, cisgender female, and heterosexual) Canadians.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".