DeepD&Cchl: an AI tool for automated 3D single-cell chloroplast detection, counting, and cell type clustering
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chloroplast density in cells varies among different types of cells and plants. In current single-cell spatiotemporal analysis, the automatic detection and quantification of chloroplasts at the single-cell level is crucial. We developed DeepD&Cchl (Deep-learning-based Detecting-and-Counting-chloroplasts), an AI tool for single-cell chloroplast detection and cell-type clustering. It utilizes You-Only-Look-Once (YOLO), a real-time detection algorithm, for accurate and efficient performance. DeepD&Cchl has been proved to identify chloroplasts in plant cells across various imaging types, including light microscopy, electron microscopy, and fluorescence microscopy. Integrated with an Intersection Over Union (IOU) module, DeepD&Cchl precisely counts chloroplasts in single- or multi-layered images, while eliminating double-counting errors. Furthermore, when combined with Cellpose, a single-cell segmentation tool, DeepD&Cchl enhances its effectiveness at the single-cell level. By counting chloroplasts within individual cells, it supports cell-type-specific clustering based on chloroplast number versus cell size, offering valuable morphological insights for single-cell studies. In summary, DeepD&Cchl is a significant advancement in plant cell analysis. It offers accuracy and efficiency in chloroplast identification, counting and cell-type classification, providing a useful tool for plant research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".