MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410619179 · doi:10.1484/m.mcs-eb.5.149774

Wandering in Late Medieval Devotional Literature

2025· book-chapter· en· W4410619179 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMedieval church studies · 2025
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval Literature and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of TorontoUniversity of OxfordModernaUniversity of Notre DameUniversity of Pennsylvania
KeywordsHistoryArtAncient history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Oxford English Dictionary defines the verb 'to wander' as: 'To go or take one's way casually or without predetermined route' .When you wander, you might not know the purpose or destination of your explorations yet, but that does not mean that wandering ultimately has no purpose.You let yourself be surprised by what you find, attentive to the unexpected things you see and encounter.Not only can the body wander, but the mind and thoughts can too.I have had the pleasure of wandering with Denis Renevey in all the best ways possible.There were walks in the Swiss mountains and around his beautiful chalet, and there were PhD supervisions during which we could wander together for hours, thinking through the complexities I had encountered during my research.This essay, therefore, is a celebration of wandering through late medi eval devotional literature, the field of study about which Denis has taught me so much -not by telling me what I should know, but by taking me to all the right places and letting me discover them by myself.In this essay I explore how wandering, and more specifically metaphors of movement, are used to express processes of spiritual progression and devotional reading in texts written for and sometimes also by enclosed religious women, anchoresses, and women in convents, in late medi eval England and the Low Countries.Then I compare descriptions of wandering in the text to descriptions of wandering through the text, asking the question: how do descriptions of movement in late medi eval texts written for these groups of women interact with incitements to non-linear or sequential reading?Such incitements could, for instance, include encouraging readers to choose themselves an order of reading, or inviting them to select certain chapters or passages of a text and to read those in isolation.Is there a connection between the occurrence of metaphors of movement and these types of reading strategies?Although all the texts that will be analysed in this essay were written for, and sometimes by, enclosed religious women, it is unlikely that the continental author that will be discussed, Alijt Bake, knew exactly what was being written in England, and vice versa.Rather than showing how one text influenced another, I seek to illustrate how different authors writing in different locations found comparable ways of expressing spiritual desires, religious ambitions, and views on reading through metaphors of movement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.736
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it