GLOBAL MARKETPLACES IN THE DIGITAL ECONOMY AS A DRIVER OF UKRAINIAN EXPORT DEVELOPMENT AND BUSINESS GROWTH
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article analyses the global development of e-commerce and its impact on international trade. It has been found that the spread of digital technologies, the growth of Internet access, and changes in consumer preferences have led to a significant increase in online trade. The countries with the most developed e-commerce markets are identified. It was found that China is the leader in this area, dominated by platforms such as Alibaba Group (Taobao, Tmall, AliExpress) and Pinduoduo. The United States of America holds the second position, thanks to the activities of leading platforms such as Amazon, eBay, and Etsy. The European market also shows high growth rates, especially in the UK, Germany, and France, with significant potential for further development. The authors have shown that e-commerce creates new opportunities for Ukrainian producers, in particular in entering international markets and selling products far beyond national borders. Thanks to global marketplaces such as Amazon, Etsy, and eBay, Ukrainian businesses can access a wide audience in the US, Europe, Canada, and other countries. The article focuses on the key barriers that prevent Ukrainian businesses from integrating into the global market: economic and political instability, high competition, restrictions related to the policies of international platforms, and the insufficient level of digitalization of business processes. The authors of the article also highlight factors that can help overcome these difficulties: quality products at affordable prices, uniqueness of Ukrainian goods, high motivation of entrepreneurs to develop and support the country’s economy, and a large number of educational and grant programs to support entrepreneurs. Based on the SWOT analysis, the article identifies strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats for Ukrainian enterprises planning to enter international platforms. The article provides recommendations on how to overcome the existing challenges, in particular by increasing the level of digitalization, developing marketing strategies, and optimizing business processes for successful operation in global e-commerce markets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".