MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410624396 · doi:10.4138/atlgeo.2025.008

Microbial components and metamorphic grade of Miaolingian (Cambrian) black shales from the Burin Peninsula, Newfoundland, Canada

2025· article· en· W4410624396 on OpenAlexaffabout
Blanca Martínez-Benítez, Andrea Mills, J. Javier Álvaro

Bibliographic record

VenueAtlantic Geoscience · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Canadian institutionsGovernment of Newfoundland and Labrador
FundersAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónUniversität GreifswaldUniversidad de GranadaMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades
KeywordsPeninsulaMetamorphic rockGeologyGeochemistryPaleontologyArchaeologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The analysis of microbial and palynological remains in Cambrian shales is useful for biostratigraphic and palaeoecological purposes but, in outcrops affected by contact metamorphism, also for discriminating burial and metamorphic temperatures. The microbial composition of the Miaolingian black shales from the Pleasant View Formation (Inlet Group) in the Burin Peninsula consists of monospecific cyanobacterial associations of Bavlinella faveolata, a cosmopolitan taxon that characterized eutrophication episodes in Neoproterozoic to Miaolingian times. The specimens show varying degrees of degradation under thin-section (2D) and Field Emission Gun Scanning Electron Microscopy (FEGSEM, 3D). Raman Spectra of Carbonaceous Materials (RSCM) thermometry applied to both the acritarchs and meshworks of amorphous organic matter has reported average metamorphic temperatures of 300 to 343 ºC, whereas the standardized Crystallinity Index Standard value of 0.35 suggests temperatures slightly below the anchizone-epizone boundary, established at 300 ºC. The most likely fit for the peak metamorphic contact temperature recorded in Miaolingian black-shale samples, collected close to the Upper Devonian St. Lawrence granitic intrusions, is within the 300-350 ºC interval.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.355

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAtlantic GeoscienceSame topicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsFrench-language works237,207