MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410632692 · doi:10.22215/etd/2024-16393

Learning with Limited Datasets: From Deep-Learning to Traditional Machine-Learning

2024· dissertation· en· W4410632692 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMachine Learning and Data Classification
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceDeep learningComputer scienceMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Learning with datasets containing a limited number of exemplars is a contentious research area. Researchers have used deep learning (DL) models with a large number of trainable parameters for such limited datasets leading to problems such as overfitting, over-parameterization, lack of generalization, and the need for large computational resources. Judicious use of appropriate learning methodologies may be in order when the dataset for training is limited. Non-DL methodologies or traditional machine learning methodologies with appropriate pre-processing and feature extraction techniques may perform at par or better than DL techniques for applications that have a limited dataset. This dissertation aims to establish this proposition for two healthcare applications namely, radar-based monitoring of human activities (and fall event detection) and thermography-based breast abnormality detection by developing computationally inexpensive novel supervised and unsupervised non-DL learning methodologies for binary and multi-class classification problems that outperform the current state-of-the-art techniques of the respective fields in those healthcare applications. The developed learning methodologies use traditional machine learning classifiers along with interpretable hand-crafted features such as histograms of oriented gradient (HOG), statistical features, and textural features. These novel learning methodologies use ensemble learning approaches such as early fusion, intermediate fusion, decision fusion, or training error correction. Novel contrast enhancement and novel gradient enhancement methodologies using binary encodings such as census transform and local binary patterns are also proposed to improve classification performance. For both applications, learning in the compressed domain using deterministic compressive sensing is introduced to reduce the number of trainable parameters of the developed novel supervised non-DL methodologies. The novel supervised learning methodologies using hand-crafted features achieved an average accuracy of 98% and 96% for fall event detection and breast abnormality detection, respectively. The novel unsupervised learning methodologies using hand-crafted features achieved an average error rate of 1.1% for fall event detection and an average F1-score of 85% for breast abnormality detection. At 0.875 compression ratio, the novel supervised learning methodologies in the compressed domain achieved an average accuracy of 97% and 87% for fall event detection and breast abnormality detection, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.819
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMachine Learning and Data ClassificationFrench-language works237,207