Polar organization of H&E dyes in histology tissue revealed by polarimetric nonlinear microscopy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Structural organization of harmonophores used in hematoxylin (H) and eosin (E) staining is studied with polarimetric multimodal second-harmonic generation (SHG), third-harmonic generation (THG) and multiphoton excitation fluorescence (MPF) microscopy in rat tail tendon histology sections. The polarimetric microscopy imaging reveals that hemalums (complexes of hematoxylin and aluminum) are well aligned with C 6 h symmetry along the collagen fibers in H-stained tissue, while eosin Y is partially aligned along the fibers in E-stained tissue and also follows organization of C 6 h symmetry. When both hemalum and eosin are used for H&E staining, the dye molecules interact and align noncentrosymmetrically with C 6 symmetry along the collagen fibers, while the stained nuclei appear isotropically organized. The polar alignment of the hemalum and eosin complexes increases the achiral second order susceptibility tensor component ratio in H&E-stained tissue. The alignment of hemalum and eosin molecules, and their complexes in collagenous tissue, must be considered in nonlinear microscopy and polarimetric analysis of H&E-stained histopathology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".