Physics-Informed Digital Twin Can Predict Cerebral Blood Flow and Cerebral Vascular Regulation Mechanisms in Neurocritical Care Patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cerebral blood flow is vital for brain function and is acutely controlled through a set of physiological mechanisms known as cerebral vascular regulation (CVR). It remains challenging to directly measure the dynamics and function of individual CVR mechanisms, limiting our ability to understand and optimize brain perfusion, particularly for neurologically injured patients. Digital twins offer an ideal tool for overcoming this gap because they enable estimation, tracking, and forecasting of unmeasured physiological states. Here, we introduce CereBRLSIM (Cerebral Blood Regulation Latent State Inference and Modeling), a digital twin that integrates physiological knowledge and patient data to infer CVR function and predict cerebral dynamics. Using both in vivo experiments and simulated data, CereBRLSIM predicted cerebral hemodynamics with high accuracy and estimated the dynamics of myogenic, endothelial, and metabolic mechanisms underlying CVR. When personalized to neurocritical care patient data, CereBRLSIM differentiated cerebral hemodynamic phenotypes, predicted patient outcomes, and forecasted blood flow with significantly higher accuracy than machine learning models. This work provides a novel, interpretable, and clinically compatible approach for quantifying CVR function and forecasting cerebral blood flow, enabling new opportunities in precision diagnostics and foundational understanding of cerebral hemodynamics.enabling new opportunities in precision diagnostics and foundational understanding of cerebral hemodynamics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".