Agile DQN: adaptive deep recurrent attention reinforcement learning for autonomous UAV obstacle avoidance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) obstacle avoidance in 3D environments demands sophisticated handling of high-dimensional inputs and effective state representations. Current Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) algorithms struggle to prioritize salient aspects of state representations and manage extensive state and action spaces, particularly in partially observable environments. Addressing these challenges, this paper proposes Agile DQN (AG-DQN), a novel algorithm that dynamically focuses on key visual features and robust Q-value estimation to enhance learning. The AG-DQN architecture synergizes several components-Glimpse Network, LSTM Recurrent Network, Emission Network, and Q-Network-to dynamically and selectively process crucial visual features, optimizing decision-making without processing the entire state. AG-DQN's adaptive temporal attention strategy also adjusts to environmental changes, maintaining a balance between recent and past observations. Experimental results demonstrate AG-DQN's improved performance over existing DRL methods, highlighting its potential in advancing autonomous UAV navigation and robotics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".