MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410639425 · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2025.3573023

Point-SCT: A Multiscale Spatial Convolution-Swin Transformer Network for Point Cloud Ground Filtering in Complex Mountainous Terrains

2025· article· en· W4410639425 on OpenAlexaff
Jingxiang Li, Fuquan Tang, Lingfei Ma, Chao Zhu, Zheng Gong, Nur Intan Raihana Ruhaiyem, Jonathan Li

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Shanxi ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsTerrainComputer sciencePoint cloudConvolution (computer science)Scale (ratio)Remote sensingCloud computingArtificial intelligenceGeologyCartographyGeographyArtificial neural network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deep learning-based point cloud segmentation methods have been extensively explored, but the majority focus either on local or global feature learning, with few integrating both. These integrated approaches have not been sufficiently explored in complex mountainous scenes with low feature heterogeneity. To address this gap, we propose a novel point-based multi-scale spatial Convolution-Swin Transformer network (Point-SCT). Point-SCT combines convolutional local geometric detail capture with global relationship modeling via dynamic window interactions in Transformer, enhancing ground filtering accuracy in challenging mountainous scenes. The encoder incorporates convolution-based Multi-Scale Local Feature Aggregation (MLFA) approach, integrating Local Geometric Feature Encoding (LGSE) and Diluent Pooling (DP) strategies to effectively aggregate local detailed geometric features while suppressing irrelevant feature vectors and enhancing the representation of low-heterogeneity feature. Additionally, the dynamic spatial window strategy within the Transformer facilitates the capture of long-range feature dependencies. To mitigate noise introduced by RGB in point cloud overlays and sharpen geometric distinctions between the ground and low-lying vegetation, we introduce Boundary Detector, Curvature, and Average Elevation (BCE) as prior inputs, replacing RGB. Finally, quantitative and qualitative analyses of Point-SCT are conducted on an airborne laser scanning (ALS) dataset from a mountainous area, with ablation studies validating the effectiveness of LGSE, DP and BCE. The comprehensive experiments demonstrate that Point-SCT robustly segments ground points in complex mountainous scenes, achieving state-of-the-art levels of accuracy and generalization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.957
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote SensingSame topicRemote Sensing and LiDAR ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207