18F-FDG PET/CT Semiquantitative and Radiomic Features for Assessing Pathologic Axillary Lymph Node Status in Clinical Stage I–III Breast Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate associations between 18F-FDG-PET/CT semiquantitative and radiomic features with pathologic axillary lymph node (ALN) status in stages I–III breast cancer patients. Methods: A search was conducted across MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases. Quality assessment was performed with QUADAS-2 and the radiomics quality score (RQS). Descriptive statistical analysis was performed. Results: Most studies were retrospective cohort studies (27/28) and reported only on semiquantitative features (26/28). Most studies were at high risk of bias in patient selection (22/28) and feature extraction (26/28). Semiquantitative features included maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumour volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG). Although associations between tumour semiquantitative features and ALN status were reported, the mean/median reported values of tumour SUVmax (3.2–8.6 vs. 2.4–9.4), MTV (2.7–19.2 vs. 1.9–10.5), and TLG (10.6–59.3 vs. 5.6–29.6) in ALN+ vs. ALN− patients were inconsistent between studies. Fourteen studies reported a significantly higher ALN SUVmax in ALN+ patients. Two studies developed models using tumour radiomic features with high accuracy for predicting ALN metastases (81.2% and 80%) but scored low on the RQS. Conclusions: Feature-based analysis of PET/CT demonstrates potential for predicting pathologic ALN status in breast cancer patients. However, establishing a clinically meaningful relationship requires higher quality evidence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.035 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.010 | 0.012 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".