MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410640253 · doi:10.1109/ojsp.2025.3572759

Streaming LiDAR Scene Flow Estimation

2025· article· en· W4410640253 on OpenAlex
Mazen Abdelfattah, Z. Jane Wang, Rabab Ward

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Open Journal of Signal Processing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Vision and Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsLidarRemote sensingEstimationComputer scienceFlow (mathematics)GeologyComputer visionEnvironmental scienceArtificial intelligenceMathematicsEngineeringGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Safe navigation of autonomous vehicles requires accurate and rapid understanding of their dynamic 3D environment. Scene flow estimation models this dynamic environment by predicting point motion between sequential point cloud scans, and is crucial for safe navigation. Existing state-of-the-art scene flow estimation methods, based on test-time optimization, achieve high accuracy but suffer from significant latency, limiting their applicability in real-time onboard systems. This latency stems from both the iterative test-time optimization process and the inherent delay of waiting for the LiDAR to acquire a complete <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$360^\circ$</tex-math></inline-formula> scan. To overcome this bottleneck, we introduce a novel <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">streaming</i> scene flow framework leveraging the sequential nature of LiDAR slice acquisition, demonstrating a dramatic reduction in end-to-end latency. Instead of waiting for the full <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$360^\circ$</tex-math></inline-formula> scan, our method immediately estimates scene flow using each LiDAR slice once it is captured. To mitigate the reduced context of individual slices, we propose a novel contextual augmentation technique that expands the target slice by a small angular margin, incorporating crucial slice boundary information. Furthermore, to enhance test-time optimization within our streaming framework, our novel initialization scheme 'warm-starts' the current optimization using optimized parameters from the preceding slice. This achieves substantial speedups while maintaining, and in some cases surpassing, full-scan accuracy. We rigorously evaluate our approach on the challenging Waymo and Argoverse datasets, demonstrating significant latency reduction without compromising scene flow quality. This work paves the way for deploying high-accuracy, real-time scene flow algorithms in autonomous driving, advancing the field towards more responsive and safer autonomous systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.986
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.004
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it