MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410642876 · doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2025.128580

Supramolecular metal-phenolic foams with monodisperse microstructure

2025· article· en· W4410642876 on OpenAlexaff
Bruno D. Mattos, Zahra Hojjati, Orlando J. Rojas, Cosima Stubenrauch

Bibliographic record

VenuePolymer · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPickering emulsions and particle stabilization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsDispersityMicrostructureMaterials scienceMetalComposite materialChemical engineeringSupramolecular chemistryPolymer chemistryOrganic chemistryChemistryMetallurgyMolecule

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Monodisperse foams are desirable in applications that require structural control, for example, in biomedical scaffolds, catalysis, insulative and acoustic materials. This study presents a novel approach for the fabrication of self-supporting metal-phenolic network (MPN) foams produced with a microfluidic flow-focusing system. For this purpose, tannic acid (TA) and titanium ions (Ti 4+ ) were used to generate stable, monodisperse liquid foams, which were subsequently dried in ambient condition resulting in solid foams. We investigated the effects of gas pressure and Ti 4+ concentration on foam formation. Rheological analysis confirmed an increase in viscosity with Ti 4+ addition, with an upper threshold at n Ti/ n TA = 0.4, beyond which fast gelation hindered microfluidic processing. The bubble size of the liquid foam templates ranged from 200 to 310 μm in diameter, depending on the gas pressure (100–200 mbar) and Ti 4+ concentration. After ambient drying we obtained open-cell solid foams with pore sizes approximately twice the initial bubble diameter, attributed to gas uptake during drying. Uniaxial compression testing showed a negative correlation between pore size and mechanical strength, with ultimate compressive strength values ranging from 5 to 25 kPa. The strongest foams were obtained at n Ti/ n TA = 0.3, balancing crosslinking density and structural integrity. Our proposed green approach provides a platform for morphological control of functional MPN foams, opening their potential for sustainable, cell seeding scaffolds, drug delivery or catalysis, among other.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.354

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePolymerSame topicPickering emulsions and particle stabilizationFrench-language works237,207