Repenser l’innovation sociale à travers le prisme de la décolonisation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article explore l’écart entre décolonisation et innovation sociale, souvent traitées séparément malgré leurs synergies potentielles. En établissant un cadre nuancé applicable à divers contextes, nous visons à intégrer les principes décoloniaux dans l’innovation sociale pour un changement plus équitable et durable. Notre recherche examine les thèmes communs, défis et opportunités des deux domaines, en mettant en lumière l’interconnexion, les relations de pouvoir inégales, la libération des récits dominants et le dialogue interculturel. Ce cadre enrichit la théorie décoloniale matérialiste avec un modèle intégrant les objectifs transformateurs des deux concepts. Il remet en question les structures de pouvoir dominantes, embrasse divers systèmes de connaissances et encourage un dialogue interculturel, offrant une évaluation plus critique des processus d’innovation sociale. Ce modèle pourrait guider praticiens, décideurs et chercheurs vers une société plus inclusive, résiliente et respectueuse des héritages historiques, tout en valorisant les perspectives diverses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.014 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.062 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.015 | 0.020 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.016 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".