MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410662181 · doi:10.3138/chr-2023-0032

Walking Together: Canadian Churches’ Campaigns for Biafra during the Nigerian Civil War

2025· article· en· W4410662181 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Taiwo Bello

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Historical Review · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Contemporary Political Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpanish Civil WarPolitical scienceHistoryAncient historyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article explores the roles of the Canadian churches in Biafra during the Nigerian Civil War. It pays particular attention to the strategies adopted by the Canadian churches involved in fundraising for Biafra and the implications of those efforts for the civilian victims of the war in the Biafran enclave. The total blockade of Biafra imposed on the secessionist state by the Nigerian government caused widespread starvation. In most parts of Biafra, it was commonplace for children to suffer from all kinds of diseases, especially kwashiorkor, as a result of lack of access to food, medicine, and other vital survival materials. Canadian missionaries who visited the secessionist enclave to assess the situation and its impact on Biafran civilians returned to Canada and mobilized their church members to support Biafra. Although the efforts of the Canadian churches were significant in the overall humanitarian scheme in wartime Biafra, their interventions were limited due to a lack of support and commitment from the Canadian government.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.529
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Historical ReviewSame topicHistorical and Contemporary Political DynamicsFrench-language works237,207