MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410687498 · doi:10.1002/oto2.70132

Trichloroacetic Acid as a Topical Treatment for Actinic Cheilitis

2025· article· en· W4410687498 on OpenAlexaffabout
Victoria Kuta, Subhashni Taylor

Bibliographic record

VenueOTO Open · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
Canadian institutionsQueen Elizabeth II Health Sciences CentreDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTrichloroacetic acidDermatologyAdverse effectGrading scaleOtorhinolaryngologyProspective cohort studySurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Importance: Actinic cheilitis is a condition of the lower lip with the potential for malignant transformation. Although many topical treatment options exist, most involve prolonged application periods with expected adverse effects that limit compliance. Objective: Trichloroacetic acid is a widely used chemical peel that has been used for the treatment of precancerous skin lesions. This study aims to study the efficacy of 35% trichloroacetic acid as a topical treatment for actinic cheilitis. Study Design: Prospective cohort study of patients with actinic cheilitis presenting to our institution between September 2020 and December 2023. After treatment completion, patients were followed twice yearly for a minimum of 2 years. Setting: Tertiary care center. Methods: All patients with actinic cheilitis presenting to an otolaryngologist-head and neck surgeon at our institution within the study time frame were eligible. Exclusion criteria include patients <18 years of age, patients who were pregnant, and patients with a biopsy-proven malignancy of the lip. A topical 35% trichloroacetic acid peel was applied to the lower lip in the minor procedure clinic following bilateral mental nerve blocks. Patients were brought back 1 month later for follow-up ± a repeat treatment. Photos were taken prior to treatment and 1 month following their final treatment. The severity of actinic cheilitis was graded using a proposed grading scale for actinic cheilitis, and the burden of the condition was assessed using Skindex-16 Surveys. Visual analog scales were used to study adverse events. Patients were monitored for remission and recurrence. Results: A total of 11 patients were enrolled, with the majority requiring one treatment to achieve clinical remission. All patients who completed their full treatment course entered clinical remission following their trichloroacetic acid treatment, and there have been no cases of recurrence to date. The most common reported side effects were redness and swelling. Patients reported a significant improvement in their quality of life following treatment. Conclusion: This study suggests that a 35% trichloroacetic acid peel is a safe, well-tolerated, and effective treatment option for patients presenting with actinic cheilitis. Further follow-up is indicated to study the longevity of the achieved results. Trial Registration: This study is registered on Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04744103). https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04744103?locStr=Halifax,%20NS,%20Canada&country=Canada&state=Nova%20Scotia&city=Halifax&cond=actinic%20cheilitis&rank=1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.764
Threshold uncertainty score0.563

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.415
Teacher spread0.360 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOTO OpenSame topicNonmelanoma Skin Cancer StudiesFrench-language works237,207