MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410697135 · doi:10.1093/europace/euaf085.034

Detailed analysis of PAC characteristics in ambulatory ECG data can improve atrial fibrillation risk prediction

2025· article· en· W4410697135 on OpenAlexaff
Nick L. van Vreeswijk, William F. McIntyre, Philipp Krisai, Pyotr G. Platonov, Jean-Baptiste Guichard, Elzbieta Gajewska-Dendek, Monika Kulesza, Stavros Stavrakis, Jeff S. Healey, Michiel Rienstra, Linda Johnson

Bibliographic record

VenueEP Europace · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicECG Monitoring and Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersVetenskapsrådet
KeywordsAtrial fibrillationAmbulatoryAmbulatory ECGCardiologyInternal medicineMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Premature atrial complexes (PACs) are associated with atrial fibrillation (AF) risk, but also common in the general population. The origin and mechanism through which PACs arise lead to different electrocardiographic presentations, and may affect AF risk. We hypothesised that PAC characteristics on ambulatory ECG may predict AF, beyond PAC frequency. Methods We included 12,660 patients with 14-30 days of lead II and III ambulatory ECG recording with a Holter device, without AF during the first 48 hours of recording. We detected QRS complexes using AI and trained a convolutional neural network model to provide automated ECG waveform measurements, using >63,000 annotated heart beats. With this we extracted a total of 89 variables related PAC P-wave morphology, pattern of occurrence in relation to other beats, and PAC-QRS coupling intervals from raw ECG signals. After splitting the dataset randomly into a training (60%) and testing (40%) dataset, we used these PAC variables from the first 48h of recording in a Gaussian mixed model to generate two clusters of patients classified as having either high or low risk of AF of ≥30 seconds in the subsequent ≥12 recording days. The association between the high AF risk cluster and subsequent AF was then tested in Cox regression models, adjusted for age and sex. Results The testing dataset included 5,135 patients (median age 63 years (IQR 49-73), 59% female). AF occurred in 360 (7.0%) patients after a median duration of 7 (IQR 3-14) days. Figure 1 shows the cumulative hazard of AF by high and low risk cluster and PAC frequency. A PAC frequency >100/day was associated with higher AF risk. The high AF-risk cluster included 3,142 patients (61.1%) and had increased AF occurrence in patients with ≤100 daily PACs (62.6% of all patients), HR 1.62, 95% CI 1.03-2.54, p=0.04, but not in patients with >100 PACs (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.63-1.26, p=0.53), p for interaction = 0.003. Conclusion Clustering analyses based on PAC morphology, pattern of occurrence and coupling interval characteristics can be used to predict AF risk in patients with ≤100 PACs/daycumulative hazards for incident AF

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.249
Threshold uncertainty score0.421

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEP EuropaceSame topicECG Monitoring and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207