MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410698553 · doi:10.1002/smll.202500418

Holistic Design of Charge Transfer Layers for Highly Efficient and Stable AgBiS<sub>2</sub> Quantum Dot Photodetectors

2025· article· en· W4410698553 on OpenAlexaff
Jiahua Kong, Zhonglin Du, Yixiao Huang, Qinggang Hou, Keke Wang, Feifei Qin, Zhenxiao Pan, Dongling Ma, Jianguo Tang

Bibliographic record

VenueSmall · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicQuantum Dots Synthesis And Properties
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Shandong ProvinceChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPhotodetectorMaterials scienceQuantum dotResponsivityOptoelectronicsCharge carrierElectron mobilityIndiumNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Developing highly efficient and stable photodetectors based on eco‐friendly AgBiS 2 quantum dots (QDs) has garnered significant attention. However, optimizing charge transfer layers (CTLs) to enhance device performance and stability remains a critical challenge. Here, the study presents the development of highly efficient, stable, fully inorganic, self‐powered AgBiS 2 QD‐based photodetectors through the holistic design of CTLs, consisting of zinc‐copper‐indium‐sulfide QDs blended with black phosphorus nanosheets as hole‐transport layers, and unzipped carbon nanotubes doped with ZnO nanoparticles as electron‐transport layers. The rationally designed CTLs exhibit well‐matched energy‐level alignment with the AgBiS 2 QDs layer and balanced charge mobility, resulting in a robust and efficient charge transfer system. The optimized device exhibits a responsivity of 20 mA/W and a detectivity of 1.9 × 10 10 Jones at 1000 nm, among the best performance for heavy metal‐free QD‐based photodetectors. The all‐inorganic nature of the devices demonstrates excellent stability for over 2 months in air, with minimal degradation in performance. Furthermore, these enhanced self‐powered AgBiS 2 QD‐based photodetectors are used as light sensors in the receiver terminal of a near‐infrared optical communication system. This work presents a comprehensive approach to the holistic design of CTLs in AgBiS 2 QD‐based photodetectors for achieving superior device performance and long‐term stability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.581

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSmallSame topicQuantum Dots Synthesis And PropertiesFrench-language works237,207