MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410702293 · doi:10.47363/jcrr/2023(5)179

AI-Driven Advancements in Breast Cancer: Transforming Detection,Diagnosis, Treatment, and Monitoring

2023· article· en· W4410702293 on OpenAlexaff
Enrique Díaz Cantón

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cancer Research Reviews & Reports · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreast cancerMedicineCancerOncologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming the fight against breast cancer. It helps in early detection and accurate diagnosis through analysis of large volumes of medical data. It allows personalized treatments, optimizes radio-oncology, and contributes to the discovery of new drugs. AI-powered chatbots assist healthcare professionals with administrative tasks. Although it offers great promise, ethical challenges need to be addressed and ensure that it complements, not replaces, physicians. Multidisciplinary collaboration is key to harnessing its potential in today’s medicine

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.484
Teacher spread0.413 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cancer Research Reviews & ReportsSame topicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingFrench-language works237,207