SIMILARITY AND DIVERSITY IMMUNOLOGICAL ABERRATIONS IN STABLE BENIGN IMMUNITY AND TOWARD ANA-RELATED AUTOIMMUNE DISEASES IN ANA-POSITIVE AT-RISK POPULATIONS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PT009 / #712 Topic: AS20 - Precision Medicine POSTER TOUR 02: RECENT INSIGHTS ON THE PATHOGENESIS OF LUPUS NEPHRITIS 23-05-2025 10:00 AM - 10:40 AM Background/Purpose Previous genetic and transcriptome studies revealed shared immune dysregulation in ANA-at-risk individuals. Upregulation of interferon-stimulated genes signature while mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation downregulation is linked to disease progression. However, functional protein studies in this population are limited. This study aims to investigate baseline functional protein dysregulation in ANA-at-risk individuals and discriminate an immune aberration between the groups. Methods Stored samples from 103 ANA-at-risk individuals (progressors = 32, nonprogressors = 67) were included in a proteome study using the EXPLORE Inflammation I and II panel, Proximity Extension Assay (PEA) technology (Olink®, Uppsala, Sweden). The module eigengenes (MEs) were constructed from 193 proteins with greater than 0.5 differential expression proteins (DEPs) when compared to healthy control (HC) by using Weighted Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) from R package version 4.3.1. Exclusively, the modular analysis from IFN-inducible proteins was computed to improve validity and reliable interpretation. The module trait correlation was analyzed using the Pearson correlation. Enrichment analysis was performed to determine the biological significance of identified modules. The false positivity was mitigated using the Benjamini-Hochberg multiple testing method; an adjusted p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Cytoscape and bioinformatics platforms were employed for data visualization. Results The unique and overlapping significant protein number was demonstrated in the Venn diagram (Figure 1A). Seven co-expressed protein modules were constructed, and 2 modules showed significant correlations with RMD progression, independent of age, gender, or antibody status. The grey module exhibited a positive correlation (r = 0.23, p = 0.02), while the green module showed a negative correlation (r = -0.22, p = 0.02) (Figure 1B). Proteins in the grey module were enriched in innate immunity pathways, particularly IFN and B cell signaling, and were highly elevated in progressors (Figure 2A). In contrast, higher in nonprogressors, the green module proteins were associated with viral processes and cell-cycle regulation (Figure 2B). Figure 2C shows the 4 IFN modules constructed from WGCNA; only the cyan module, containing both IFN-I and IFN-II inducible proteins, overlapped with the proteins in the grey module and had a significant positive correlation with RMD progression (Figure 2D). In nonprogressors, the IFN-I negative regulators YY1, PTPN6, and YTHDF3 were elevated, and an inverse relationship between positive and negative IFN-inducible protein DEPs was demonstrated (Figure 2E). Besides this, the proteins included in the remaining 5 modules had significantly higher DEPs when compared to HC (Figure 1C), implicating biological processes such as cellular stress response, apoptosis, protein phosphorylation, and cytokine signaling (Figure 1D). Figure 1. The significant protein numbers between ANA+ and HC (A), Proteomic modular from weighted gene co-expression network analysis and trait correlation (B), the DEPs between ANA+ and HC from 5 nonsignificant modules (C), and biological function (D). Figure 2. The significant RMDs progression modules (A) and IFN-inducible proteins modules (B-F). Conclusions This comprehensive proteomic study revealed robust immunological and cellular metabolism disequilibrium among ANA at-risk individuals regardless of progression to RMDs. IFN play a crucial role in ANA positivity. However, it might only be a surrogate marker of cellular response to external (eg, viral infection) or internal stressors (eg, DNA damage response). This finding underscores the influence of IFN-I, and a dual IFN and B cell regulation aberration promotes the progression to RMDs. Identifying the biomarkers involved in these pathways might have resulted in higher RMD progression predictive accuracy than conventional ANA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".