MRL-LPR MICE DISPLAY ALTERED NOCICEPTION: A POSSIBLE MODEL FOR LUPUS PERIPHERAL NEUROPATHY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PV015 / #269 Poster Topic: AS02 - Animal Models Background/Purpose Affective disorders and cognitive abnormalities, as well as other neuropsychiatric SLE (NPSLE) manifestations, occur in 20-40% of lupus patients. Of the 19 ACR case definitions for NPSLE, 7 involve the peripheral nervous system. Treatment options for patients with NPSLE remain limited, nonspecific, and mostly non-evidenced based. Furthermore, many patients do not respond to treatment, and face significant neuropsychiatric disability. Our understanding of NPSLE is unfortunately not as advanced as for other lupus manifestations, hampered by the difficulty in obtaining human brain tissue. Therefore, animal models have added importance in investigating disease mechanisms and identifying novel therapeutic targets, especially for manifestations of disease shared between animal models and human SLE. MRL-lpr mice spontaneously develop high-titer anti-DNA and other nuclear autoantibodies, proliferative glomerulonephritis, and inflammatory skin disease, as well as depressive-like behavior and cognitive abnormalities at a young age.[1] However, while peripheral neuropathy is common in human lupus patients, whether MRL/lpr mice display peripheral nervous system disease has not been carefully studied. Our goal was to determine if MRL/lpr mice display altered nociception, and could potentially be used to model lupus-associated peripheral neuropathy. Methods A previous study by Yan et al[2] demonstrated that female MRL/lpr mice exhibit thermal hyperalgesia and mechanical allodynia. Thermal sensitivity was measured based upon the withdrawal response of the hind paws to increased temperature generated by a radiant heat beam device. Hyperalgesia was demonstrated in 13-week-old animals, but withdrawal latencies did not change between 10 and 12 weeks and were similar to those in control mice. To better evaluate altered sensory function and develop an assay to easily monitor the effects of potential therapeutic interventions, we enhanced the standard testing protocol by incrementally raising the temperature from 40 to 52 °C within a 180-second time frame. The test focuses on observing paw licking, which signifies the behavioral reaction to the thermal stimulus. This careful modulation allowed us to accurately record the latency, or response time, for the mice to lick their fore and hind paws. Results We compared female MRL/lpr mice to age and sex-matched control mice from the background MRL strain (separate cohorts of 8-12 week old mice). We found that already at 8 weeks of age, MRL/lpr mice exhibit a notable increase in thermal hyperalgesia (ie, decreased latency until withdrawal) (102±4.02 seconds, n=8) compared to the control MRL strain (126±2.34, n=7), a significant difference in the mean latencies of hind paw licking responses between the 2 experimental groups (p=0.02, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Similar thermal hyperalgesia responses were observed in the MRL/lpr strain also at 10 and 12 weeks. Ongoing studies are focused on identifying the earliest detectable heightened sensitivity, and exploring how standard treatment with cyclophosphamide and other immunosuppressives influences the nociceptive response in this lupus-prone strain. Conclusions MRL-lpr mice display heightened temperature sensitivity. Altered nociception in this strain may represent an early and sensitive tool to detect NPSLE, and if confirmed, may serve to model the involvement of the peripheral nervous system in this disease. References: [1.] Polis B. Autoimmunity 2024;57(1):2330387. [2.] Yan X. J Neurochem 2017;140(6):963-76.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".