MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4410715689 · doi:10.3899/jrheum.2025-0390.o054

ADMINISTRATION OF BELIMUMAB IN EARLY ACTIVE LUPUS PATIENTS HINDERS ACCRUAL OF EULAR/ACR CRITERIA WITHIN THE FIRST 12 MONTHS OF TREATMENT

2025· article· en· W4410715689 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mariele Gatto, Claudio Cruciani, Pietro Francesco Gavino Pilo, Elisa Bellis, Annamaria Iagnocco, Andrea Doria, Savino Sciascia

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBelimumabMedicineSystemic lupus erythematosusLupus erythematosusAccrualInternal medicinePhysical therapyAntirheumatic AgentsRheumatologyImmunologyDiseaseAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O054 / #505 Topic: AS24 - SLE-Treatment ABSTRACT CONCURRENT SESSION 09: SLE THERAPY – REVISITING OLD DRUGS AND UNLOCKING HIDDEN POTENTIAL OF NEW MEDICATIONS 24-05-2025 10:40 AM - 11:40 AM Background/Purpose Addition of biologic drugs to standard of care (SoC) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is advised in refractory patients. Evidence is needed on the effectiveness of early biologic use in influencing SLE course. In this cohort study, we aim to assess the effect of belimumab administration on disease progression in early active lupus patients. Methods We performed a multicentric observational study on patients with early SLE receiving either belimumab or SoC alone and compared the rate of EULAR/ACR 2019 criteria accrual between the 2 groups as a measure of lupus progression over time. Patients were defined as early active if they were diagnosed within 12 months from treatment initiation and displayed up to 2 EULAR/ACR clinical criteria, excluding major organ involvement, with active serology (ie, positive anti-dsDNA antibodies and/or decreased serum complement). Clinical, demographic and serological data were collected in an anonymized fashion at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months. Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank comparison were used to assess criteria accrual throughout the first 12 month of follow-up. Results We included 57 early active SLE patients, 24 (42.1%) receiving SoC alone and 33 (57.9%) receiving add on belimumab to SoC and followed up for at least 12 months from baseline. The groups were comparable in terms of age, gender, disease duration, background immunosuppression and overall disease activity at baseline. Patients doomed to early belimumab displayed higher mean SLICC and prednisone daily dosage (Table 1). Overall, 8.7 events/100-patients years occurred in our cohort. Twenty-five percent of patients on SoC vs 3.2% of patients on early belimumab accrued at least one EULAR/ACR criterion throughout the follow-up (p=0.035). Patients on SoC displayed development of skin rash (2 cases), arthritis (1 case), lupus nephritis (1 case), while one case of pericarditis occurred in the belimumab group. Criteria-free survival was significantly longer in patients receiving belimumab early as compared to those receiving SoC alone (log-rank 5.78, p=0.016) (Figure 1). Mean time-to-event (months) was shorter in patients on SoC alone (10.3± 3.33 vs. 11.8±1.07, p=0.027). Table 1. Baseline clinical and demographic features of early SLE patients Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier curves depicting criteria-free survival in patient groups Continuous variables expressed as mean±SD. HCQ, hydroxycholoroquine; IS, immunosuppressants; cSLEDAI-2K, clinical SLE-activity index 2000; SLICC-DI, SLICC damage index Conclusions Timely use of belimumab in patients with early active SLE can significantly delay disease progression, potentially preventing development of severe manifestations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Rheumatology→Same topicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research→French-language works237,207→