MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4410715783 · doi:10.3899/jrheum.2025-0390.o059

THE IMMUNE MAP OF LUPUS NEPHRITIS: A SPATIALLY-RESOLVED KIDNEY PROTEOMIC APPROACH

2025· article· en· W4410715783 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Chen‐Yu Lee, M. Caleb Marlin, Xiaoping Yang, Vasileios Morkotinis, Alessandra Ida Celia, Jill P. Buyon, Richard Furie, Diane L. Kamen, Jeff Hodgin, Chaim Putterman, Jennifer L. Barnas, Kenneth Kalunian, Peter Izmirly, Betty Diamond, Anne Davidson, Judith A. James, Michelle Petri, Joel M. Guthridge, Avi Z. Rosenberg, Andrea Fava

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLupus nephritisMedicineImmune systemNephritisImmunologyKidneySystemic lupus erythematosusLupus erythematosusPathologyInternal medicineAntibodyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O059 / #244 Topic:AS16 - Lupus Nephritis-Pathogenesis ABSTRACT CONCURRENT SESSION 10: INTEGRATING PROTEOMIC & TRANSCRIPTOMICS IN SLE 24-05-2025 10:40 AM - 11:40 AM Background/Purpose Treatment response in lupus nephritis (LN) remain inadequately low, highlighting the need for better understanding of LN pathogenesis to improve management. Single-cell transcriptomic studies are providing an unprecedented catalog of cell states in LN, yet their spatial organization is not well understood. Since structure underlies function, we aim to map the spatial organization of immune cells in LN. Methods We developed a serial immunohistochemistry (sIHC) workflow (18-plex), followed by imaging and destaining cycles. Image processing was performed using HALO (Indica Labs), including AI-assisted tissue classification. PCA was used for dimensional reduction, and KNN and SNN algorithms were applied to identify immune cell types based on their markers’ fluorescent intensity. Immune cell aggregates in the tissues were defined using DBSCAN as a minimum of 3 cells within a radius (epsilon) of 50 μm to infer interactions between cells. Aggregate sizes were categorized into small (3-29 cells), medium (30-99 cells), and large (>100 cells) based on the frequency distribution (Figure 1A,B). The proportion of immune cell types in each aggregate was used for K-means clustering to determine aggregate subtypes. Clinical features were correlated with each aggregate subtype using Pearson’s correlation coefficient (Figure 2). Figure 1. Demographics of intrarenal immune cell aggregates. (A) Digitalized biopsy showing an example of the distribution of immune cells in LN. (B) Examples of intrarenal immune cell aggregates of different sizes. (C) Distribution of aggregates by size and by total cells. (D) Distribution of aggregates by size and region. (E) Density of aggregate types according to size and class. Figure 2. Correlation between aggregate subtypes and clinical features. Left heatmaps show aggregates subtypes. Middle heatmaps display the average density of aggregate subtypes (average number of aggregates/mm²). Right heatmaps show the correlation matrices between the aggregate subtypes and clinical features. (A) Glomerular small aggregate (B) Tubulointerstitial small aggregate (C) Tubulointerstitial medium aggregate (D) Tubulointerstitial large aggregate. Act: NIH activity index; Chr: NIH Chronicity Index. Results In this analysis, we included 29 kidney biopsies of LN resulting in 1,913,845 cells (182,783 immune cells). We identified 12,371 cellular aggregates. Most (97%) aggregates were small (<30 cells) (Figure 1C,D); however, medium and large aggregates included 33.7% of immune cells. Glomerular aggregates were numerically increased in proliferative and mixed classes (Figure 1E). These were small and primarily composed of CD68+ myeloid cells (Figure 2A). Glomerular aggregates rich in CD68+ cells negatively correlated with UPCR, while aggregates rich in lymphocytes negatively correlated with chronicity (Figure 2A). In contrast, tubulointerstitial (TI) aggregate density was similar across LN classes (Figure 1E) and negatively correlated with GFR. Significant heterogeneity in aggregate composition revealed >10 aggregate subtypes according to composition and size (Figure 2). Small aggregates tended to be restricted to 1-2 cell types each, while medium and large aggregates included mixed proportions of CD4+ T, CD8+ T, B, dendritic, myeloid, and plasma cells, suggesting germinal center-like structures (Figure 2). Distinct TI aggregate subtypes associated with specific clinical and pathological features (Figure 2B,C). Conclusions We describe the heterogeneity in glomerular and TI immune cell structures in LN, offering insights into LN pathological processes and potential cellular interactions based on proximity. TI inflammation appears similar in membranous and proliferative LN, yet specific immune structures are linked to distinct clinical and pathological features.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Rheumatology→Same topicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research→French-language works237,207→