MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410718723 · doi:10.1080/03044181.2025.2507117

Guilds and Urban Governance: Montpellier, c. 1350-1530

2025· article· en· W4410718723 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medieval History · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMedieval and Early Modern Justice
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCorporate governanceHistoryGeographyAncient historyEconomicsManagement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present article examines the changes professional associations (‘craft guilds’) and municipal institutions of Montpellier, Languedoc, underwent from c. 1350 into the first decades of the sixteenth century. The first section reconsiders what constituted a ‘guild’ in the Montpellier context, emphasising their integral role in the city’s civic life instead of their economic functions. Questioning the nature of craft guilds allows for an analysis of workers’ culture and reveals how workers perceived their roles in the urban community. It suggests that the accepted conclusions of prior research should be reviewed in light of the local modes of municipal governance. The second and third sections draw on a variety of municipal records to chart the evolution of Montpellier’s guilds from 1350 to the early sixteenth century, analysing the process of restructuring and rationalisation of their mode of governance that paralleled that of the municipal government.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.549
Threshold uncertainty score0.402

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it