MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410723778 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2025.3548056

Task Offloading and Resource Management for IIoT With Satellite–Terrestrial Integrated Computing Power Network Based on D3QN

2025· article· en· W4410723778 on OpenAlexaff
Meng Li, Meihui Li, Kan Wang, F. Richard Yu, Zhuwei Wang, Pengbo Si

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSatellite Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersBeijing Municipal Natural Science FoundationNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceResource management (computing)Task (project management)SatelliteResource (disambiguation)Computer networkDistributed computingSystems engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The management of computing resources through the computing power network (CPN) has gradually become a focal point of research. With the development of the 6th generation (6G) mobile networks, some promising technologies, such as satellite-terrestrial integrated network (STIN) and smart endogenous network driven by artificial intelligence (AI) are increasingly being applied in Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT). However, several issues in current studies are worthy of attention: 1) the large number of devices powered by battery in IIoT; 2) the complex communication environments; and 3) the finite computing resources for task data processing. To cope with these challenges, a satellite-terrestrial integrated CPN (STICPN) framework is introduced in this article. Within this framework, a task offloading link selection scheme is proposed, which minimizes the delay and the consumption of energy. The task offloading optimization problem is modeled as a markov decision process (MDP). Meanwhile, deep reinforcement learning (DRL) algorithm is employed to adapt to the dynamic states of environment. Specifically, a Dueling Double Deep Q Network (D3QN) is used to make optimal decisions and delay as well as energy consumption can be reduced significantly. Moreover, the D3QN-based scheme extends the usage time of IIoT devices. The simulation results indicate that the proposed scheme outperforms the comparison schemes significantly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Internet of Things JournalSame topicSatellite Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207