MobNas ensembled model for breast cancer prediction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Breast cancer poses a real and immense threat to humankind, thus a need to develop a way of diagnosing this devastating disease early, accurately, and in a simpler manner. Thus, while substantial progress has been made in developing machine learning algorithms, deep learning, and transfer learning models, issues with diagnostic accuracy and minimizing diagnostic errors persist. This paper introduces MobNAS, a model that uses MobileNetV2 and NASNetLarge to sort breast cancer images into benign, malignant, or normal classes. The study employs a multi-class classification design and uses a publicly available dataset comprising 1,578 ultrasound images, including 891 benign, 421 malignant, and 266 normal cases. By deploying MobileNetV2, it is easy to work well on devices with less computational capability than is used by NASNetLarge, which enhances its applicability and effectiveness in other tasks. The performance of the proposed MobNAS model was tested on the breast cancer image dataset, and the accuracy level achieved was 97%, the Mean Absolute Error (MAE) was 0.05, and the Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) was 95%. From the findings of this research, it is evident that MobNAS can enhance diagnostic accuracy and reduce existing shortcomings in breast cancer detection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".