MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410730207 · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-91585-7_18

The BRAVO Semantic Segmentation Challenge Results in UNCV2024

2025· book-chapter· en· W4410730207 on OpenAlexaff
Tuan-Hung Vu, Eduardo Valle, Andrei Bursuc, Tommie Kerssies, Daan de Geus, Gijs Dubbelman, Long Qian, Bingke Zhu, Yingying Chen, Ming Tang, Jinqiao Wang, Tomáš Vojíř, J Šochman, Jiřı́ Matas, Michael A. Smith, Frank P. Ferrie, Shamik Basu, Christos Sakaridis, Luc Van Gool

Bibliographic record

VenueLecture notes in computer science · 2025
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAnomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
FundersEuropean Commission
KeywordsComputer scienceSegmentationArtificial intelligenceNatural language processingComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score0.136

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0060.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueLecture notes in computer scienceSame topicAnomaly Detection Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207