Effects of early feeding technologies providing methionine supplementation on performance, lipid oxidation, and some immune-related gene expression in broiler chicken
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In ovo administration of DL-methionine and post-hatch Hydrogel® supplements were tested to examine the impact of early feeding on performance and immune-related traits in a commercial broiler stock. One thousand one hundred and twenty Ross 308 eggs were incubated and assigned to seven treatment groups: intact (no in ovo administration) and immediate feed access (C1), in ovo saline treatment and immediate feed access (C2), intact and delayed feeding (ID), in ovo saline treatment and delayed feeding (IoS), in ovo DL-Methionine treatment and delayed feeding (IoM), intact and delayed access to feed, but immediate access to commercial Hydrogel® without (Hyd) or with 5mg/kg (HydM) DL-methionine post-hatch. The results showed, that the in-ovo methionine may have positive effects on the weight gain of the birds (p < 0.001) compared to the commercial Hydrogel® however, it cannot compete with the immediate feeding. The number of heterophils decreased significantly (p < 0.001) by day 21 in ID and IoS compared to the immediately fed control (C1). The number of lymphocytes, monocytes, and eosinophils, increased in treatments supplemented with methionine (p < 0.05) (IoM,HydM) indicating enhanced immune protection. There were no differences in the total antioxidant capacity (FRAP) and malonaldehyde concentration (MDA) (p = 0.07) in the examined groups. The Cytochrome P450 H1 (CYP2H1) gene was downregulated in all treatment groups (on days 21 and 35) indicating a slower metabolism, particularly in the ID group compared to C1 and C2 (p < 0.001). The HydM treatment could upregulate the IL2 expression as the immediate feeding, while only IoM treatment resulted in significant downregulation by day 35 (p < 0.001). IL6 was upregulated in all treatment groups (p < 0.001) except for HydM, where the gene expression did not differ from the housekeeping gene. Early administration of dietary methionine has a positive effect on performance and the immune system, however, none of the early feeding methods can compete with immediate feed access. The possible positive effects of early nutrition and its epigenetic impact should be examined in further studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".