Children and young people in socially and educationally excluded living conditions – leisure and youth clubs’ work with inclusion processes aimed at the school
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article focuses on the opportunities and impacts of leisure and youth clubs in supporting children and young people who grow up in socially deprived housing areas. These clubs help maintain their schooling and prevent social and learning exclusion processes that seem to occur in school and society. The theoretical and empirical analyses presented are based on a research project that followed children, young people and pedagogical staff in leisure and youth clubs located in three different socially deprived housing areas in Denmark. Inspired by critical psychology and social theory of practice (Holzkamp, K. [2013. “Psychology: Social Self–understanding on the Reasons for Action in the Conduct of Everyday Life.” In Psychology from the Standpoint of the Subject. Selected Writings of Klaus Holzkamp, edited by E. Schraube, and U. Osterkamp, 233–341. New York: Palgrave Macmillian.]; Dreier, O. [2008. Psychotherapy in everyday life. Learning in doing: Social, cognitive, & computational perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press.], Dreier, O. [2009. “The Development of a Personal Conduct of Life in Childhood.” In Varieties of Theoretical Psychology: International Philosophies and Practical Concerns, edited by T. Teo, P. Stenner, A. Rutherford, E. Park, and C. Baerveldt, 175–183. Toronto: Captus Press Inc.], Dreier, O. [2011. “Personality and the Conduct of Everyday Life.” Nordic Psychology 63 (2): 4–23.]; Wenger, E. [1998. Communities of Practice. Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: University Press.]), the analyses of the empirical material identify how young people, especially young men of ethnic minority backgrounds, struggle to maintain their schooling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".