Regulatory Coordination of Photophysical, Photochemical, and Biochemical Reactions in the Photosynthesis of Land Plants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Balance among the sequential photophysical, photochemical, and biochemical reactions of photosynthesis is needed for converting fleeting energy in light to stable energy in chemical bonds. Any imbalance acts as either a bottleneck for limiting photosynthetic efficiency or an agent for inducing structural and functional damage to photosynthetic apparatus. Not only must each reaction be carefully regulated, but regulatory processes must also be coordinated across the reactions. However, regulations of different stages of photosynthesis have rarely been studied jointly. Non‐photochemical quenching ( NPQ ) and stomatal conductance ( g s ) are key regulators of photophysical and biochemical reactions, respectively. Existing evidence suggests that the redox state of plastoquinone regulates g s and that the photochemical reactions are partially regulated by the ultrastructural dynamics of thylakoids induced by osmotic water fluxes in chloroplasts of land plants. To examine how these regulations are coordinated and feedback to each other, we simultaneously measured NPQ and g s and inferred the redox state of plastoquinone and the light‐induced thylakoid swelling/shrinking on numerous C 3 and C 4 species. For all species measured, NPQ and g s covary with the redox states of the electron transport chain, particularly plastoquinone, and increase as thylakoid swelling is inferred. NPQ has the maximal sensitivity at the light intensity at which thylakoid is inferred to be fully swollen. Our findings suggest that plant energy and water use strategies are intimately linked by evolution, and studying the regulations of different photosynthetic stages as a whole can lead to new insights of the functioning of photosynthetic machinery in dynamic environments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".