MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410738006 · doi:10.1109/tnano.2025.3571388

QSBMs: Lightweight Quantized Simulated Bifurcation Ising Machines

2025· article· en· W4410738006 on OpenAlexafffund
Tingting Zhang, Jie Han

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlberta InnovatesUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsBifurcationIsing modelComputer sciencePhysicsStatistical physicsControl theory (sociology)MathematicsArtificial intelligenceNonlinear systemQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ising machines have shown great potential as efficient domain-specific accelerators for solving combinatorial optimization problems (COPs). Derived from quantum mechanics, simulated bifurcation (SB) achieves massive parallelism in updating the spin states in an Ising machine. Although SB speeds up the search for a solution compared to traditional simulated annealing, it requires more hardware resources since continuous variables are used for the positions of oscillators to obtain discrete spin states. In this article, lightweight quantized SB Ising machines (QSBMs) are developed to achieve a better tradeoff between search performance and hardware efficiency. In various quantization schemes, ternary and multiple-value quantized SB (qSB) algorithms discretize the position variables for the multiply-and-accumulate (MAC) operations in SB. The ternary qSB with dynamic threshold settings converts the MAC into addition, while uniform and logarithmic quantization schemes improve precision in the number representation when solving large-scale COPs. Three hardware-efficient QSBMs are subsequently designed with a fully connected topology. Synthesized on a Xilinx Virtex UltraScale+ field-programmable gate array (FPGA), the costly multiplication is implemented by using simple logic operators. Fully connected 2048-spin QSBMs use up to 50.8% fewer lookup tables and up to 82.5% fewer flip-flops than conventional FPGA-based SB machines. The QSBMs are superior in both long and short searches, respectively reaching 99. 1% and 98.5% of the best known solution in 1.46 <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$ms$</tex-math></inline-formula> and 0.73 <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$ms$</tex-math></inline-formula> on solving 2000-spin Ising problems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.859
Threshold uncertainty score0.887

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on NanotechnologySame topicAdvancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207