MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410738508 · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-91767-7_24

The Second Visual Object Tracking Segmentation VOTS2024 Challenge Results

2025· book-chapter· en· W4410738508 on OpenAlexaff
Matej Kristan, Jiřı́ Matas, Pavel Tokmakov, Michael Felsberg, Luka Čehovin Zajc, Alan Lukežič, Khanh-Tung Tran, Xuan-Son Vu, Johanna Björklund, Hyung Jin Chang, Gustavo J. Fernández, Minasadat Attari, Antoni Chan, Liang Chen, Xin Chen, Jaired Collins, Yutao Cui, Ganesh Sai Manas Devarapu, Y. F. Du, Heng Fan, Wan-Cyuan Fan, Zhenhua Feng, Mingqi Gao, Rama Krishna Gorthi, Raghav Goyal, Jungong Han, Bijaya Hatuwal, Zhenyu He, Xiantao Hu, Xingsen Huang, Yuqing Huang, Dongmei Jiang, Ben Kang, Palaniappan Kannappan, Josef Kittler, Simiao Lai, Ning Li, Xiaohai Li, Xin Li, Cheng Liang, Liting Lin, Haibin Ling, Ting Liu, Ziquan Liu, Huchuan Lu, Yifei Luo, Deshui Miao, Juan Mogollon, Ziqi Pang, Jaswanth Reddy Pochimireddy, Viktor Prutyanov, Gani Rahmon, A. Yu. Romanov, Liangtao Shi, Mennatullah Siam, Leonid Sigal, Arun Kumar Sivapuram, Roman Solovyev, Elham Soltani Kazemi, Imad Eddine Toubal, Jia Wan, Limin Wang, Xinying Wang, Yaowei Wang, Yu-Xiong Wang, Zhiquan Wang, Gangshan Wu, Qiangqiang Wu, Xiao‐Jun Wu, Zihao Xia, Jinxia Xie, Chenlong Xu, Tianyang Xu, Yong Xu, Chaocan Xue, Chao Yang, Jinyu Yang, Ming-Hsuan Yang, Chenyang Yu, Ke Yu, Chunhui Zhang, Jiaming Zhang, Zhipeng Zhang, Feng Zheng, Yaozong Zheng, Bineng Zhong, Jinglin Zhou, Junbao Zhou, Yong Zhou, Zikun Zhou, Guibo Zhu, Jiawen Zhu, Xuefeng Zhu, V. V. Zunin

Bibliographic record

VenueLecture notes in computer science · 2025
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Surveillance and Tracking Methods
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech UniversityUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of British Columbia Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer visionArtificial intelligenceSegmentationObject (grammar)Image segmentationTracking (education)Video trackingComputer graphics (images)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0050.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueLecture notes in computer scienceSame topicVideo Surveillance and Tracking MethodsFrench-language works237,207