MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410741724 · doi:10.2147/copd.s511334

Real-World Effectiveness of Triple Extrafine Fixed-Dose Combination with Beclomethasone/Formoterol/Glycopyrronium on Symptoms and Lung Function in COPD: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2025· review· en· W4410741724 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Paola Rogliani, Gian Marco Manzetti, Mario Cazzola, Luigino Calzetta

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of COPD · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeta-analysisFormoterolMedicineLung functionCOPDAnesthesiaInternal medicineLungInhalation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a significant global health issue characterized by persistent airflow limitation and inflammation. Triple fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), long-acting β 2-agonists (LABA), and long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) show promise by potentially enhancing bronchodilation and anti-inflammatory effects. Although randomized controlled trials (RCTs) provide efficacy data, they may not fully represent real-world clinical practice, highlighting the value of real-world evidence (RWE). Methods: This study conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective observational multicenter studies to evaluate the real-world effectiveness of a triple extrafine FDC containing beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP), formoterol fumarate (FF), and glycopyrronium (G) in moderate-to-severe COPD patients. Databases MEDLINE and SCOPUS were searched for relevant studies reporting on the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV 1 ). Results: The meta-analysis included seven studies with 5952 patients, indicating high methodological quality with Newcastle–Ottawa Scale scores ≥ 7. Results showed significant improvement in CAT scores (− 5.82 95% CI − 7.61 - − 4.03; P < 0.001) and FEV 1 (127 mL 95% CI 42– 212; P < 0.001) for extrafine BDP/FF/G FDC compared to any prior treatments (ICS/LABA, ICS+LABA, LABA/LAMA, LABA+LAMA, multiple-inhaler triple therapy, single-inhaler triple therapy), exceeding minimal clinically important differences. Heterogeneity was significant, but Egger’s test suggested no significant publication bias. Conclusion: The triple extrafine BDP/FF/G FDC effectively improves health status and lung function in real-world COPD patients, supporting its use as a viable therapeutic strategy. Further research should explore long-term outcomes and investigate specific patient subgroups to optimize individualized treatment approaches. Keywords: COPD, symptoms, lung function, real-world evidence, meta-analysis

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.550
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of COPDSame topicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchFrench-language works237,207