MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410746274 · doi:10.1111/pbi.70146

A highly efficient <scp>CRISPR</scp> ‐Cas9‐based gene‐editing system in oat ( <i>Avena sativa L.</i> )

2025· article· en· W4410746274 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Mehtab‐Singh, Rajvinder Kaur, Jaswinder Singh

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Biotechnology Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaPrairie Oat Growers AssociationAgriculture Funding ConsortiumMcGill University
KeywordsAvenaBiologyCRISPRGenome editingGeneCas9GeneticsComputational biologyBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cultivated oat (Avena sativa L.), a cereal of worldwide importance, belongs to the Aveneae family of cereals, distinguishing it from wheat, rye, barley and rice. This distinction explains its unique characteristics, such as high β-glucan and oil content, distinctive fatty acid composition and gluten-free nature, making it suitable for both human consumption and animal feed. Since the 1870s, oat-breeding programs have achieved remarkable improvements in various traits, including disease resistance, yield, milling quality and β-glucan content. However, the process remains lengthy, labour-intensive and cumbersome. The recent unravelling of the massive 12.5 Gb oat genome revealed breeding barriers owing to the ancestral large-scale translocations and inversions (Kamal et al., 2022). Hence, the traditional introgression of traits through breeding cannot be attained due to recombination suppression and pseudo-linkage at such genetic loci. This highlights the urgent need to employ the latest genome editing technologies for oat improvement, which holds the utmost potential for altering specific gene functions and introducing allelic diversity. Over the past decade, the Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)-Cas9 system has been extensively used for crop improvement and functional genomics in all other cereals except oats (Ahmar et al., 2024). Its large repetitive genome with three sub-genomes, lack of efficient transformation, recalcitrant nature and complex molecular screening due to gene redundancy are major obstacles to gene-editing success. We report the first successful CRISPR-Cas9-based gene editing in oat, generating deletions and insertions. To test whether the CRISPR-Cas9 system can produce targeted gene editing in oat, different single guide RNAs (sgRNAs) were designed to target the Thaumatin-like protein 8 (TLP8), Vernalization 3 (VRN3) and Vernalization 3-D (VRN3D) in hexaploid oat (Figure 1a,b; Figure S5). TLP8 has been associated with β-glucan, the primary heart-healthy fibre that makes oats valuable for human consumption (Singh et al., 2017). Concomitantly, VRN3 is a member of the PEBP (Phosphatidylethanolamine-binding protein) family and has been mapped to a QTL associated with plant height, oil content and other crucial yield-related traits in oat. Intriguingly, VRN3D is in a recombination-suppressed region on the inverted 7D chromosome, making it an interesting candidate for gene editing (Tinker et al., 2022). Mature seeds of the hexaploid spring oat variety Park were selected for transformation due to the recent success in our lab with the introduction of Ac/Ds elements and the refinement of fatty acid composition using particle gun bombardment (Mahmoud et al., 2022; Zhou et al., 2024). Seeds were sterilized with bleach, and calli were produced for plant transformation. The transformed calli underwent three rounds of hygromycin selection (20 mg/L) followed by regeneration and rooting of transgenic calli on the respective media supplemented with 5 mg/L hygromycin (Figure 1h; Methods S1). Three individual constructs (pJDTLP8, pJDVRN3 and pJDVRN3D) were designed by cloning the gene-specific guides driven by wheat U6 promoter in the JD633 backbone with ubiquitin promoters for GRF–GIF chimera, Cas9 and hygromycin (hpt) (Debernardi et al., 2020) (Figure 1a,b; Figure S5). For the TLP8 gene, a total of 100 calli were bombarded with the pJDTLP8 construct, producing 21 transgenic plants with a transformation efficiency of 21% (Figure S1). The guide-flanking region of the AsTLP8 was then amplified using TLP8 gene primers (Table S1) and subjected to next-generation sequencing (NGS). The analysis confirmed seven T0 gene-edited plants, reporting a highly efficient gene-editing frequency of 41.1% (Figure 1f). Notably, the PCK-7 plant had a 4 bp deletion in the TLP8C, an 11 bp deletion and a 1 bp (T) insertion in the TLP8D (Figure 1c). In another experiment, 75 calli were bombarded with pJDVRN3 targeting the oat VRN3, yielding six transgenic plants confirmed through hygromycin (hpt) gene PCR with a mean transformation efficiency of 8% (Figure 1e,f; Table S1). All the plants were successfully regenerated and transferred to soil in the growth chamber. The target region was PCR amplified from the T0 transgenic lines using the VRN3 primers (Table S1) and sequenced by NGS. The sequencing results reported gene-edited plants with small deletions and insertions in the VRN3 gene (Figure 1d). Intriguingly, the 4 bp deletion in VRN3D altered the NcoI restriction site that facilitated the screening of knockout mutants through cleaved amplified polymorphic sequence (CAPS) assay. The CAPS genotyping identified the gene-edited lines with 4 bp deletion depicting undigested mutated PCR amplicon, while the WT control was completely digested (Figure 1g). The undigested amplicon was gel extracted and the 4 bp deletion was confirmed by Sanger sequencing (Figure S4). In total, three gene-edited plants were obtained in the T0 generation, with mutations in all three VRN3 copies reporting a high gene-editing efficiency of 50% (Figure 1d,f). Since we were anticipating a perceptible phenotype in the VRN3 lines, they were advanced to the next generations. To test the heritability and transgene segregation, 65 T1 plants of the JMV3-25F T0 line were screened at the guide region using the CAPS assay, followed by NGS and Sanger sequencing. DNA was amplified from 65 T1 lines using VRN3D-specific gene primers, followed by restriction digestion with NcoI, as the restriction site has been altered in VRN3D-edited plants (Table S1). Of the 65 T1 plants screened using the CAPS assay, 51 (78.5%) contained gene edits for VRN3D (Figure 1f; Figure S2). Further analysis revealed 38 Cas9-free plants, out of which two were homozygous, while 26 plants had heterozygous mutations (Figure 1f; Figure S3). The plants were phenotyped in a controlled growth chamber under long-day conditions (16 h light/8 h dark). Two distinct and intriguing phenotypes were observed in the T1 progeny, and their genotypes were extrapolated through NGS using homoeologous gene-specific primers. One set of plants (#25F–17, #25F-10 and #25F-39) displayed impaired flag leaf development (sharp bend near the flag leaf tip) at the booting stage (Z41) as compared to the WT and null plants that showed healthy upright flag leaves (Figure 1j) (Zadoks et al., 1974). Such plants carried a heterozygous mutation in the VRN3D, while the VRN3A and VRN3C remained unedited (AACCdD) (Figure 1l; Figures S2, S4). Transgenerational inheritance of the bent leaf trait was consistently observed in the T2 generation of the #25F-17 plant. This phenotype was further validated in other VRN3D mutants generated through a VRN3D-specific guide (Figure S5). The bend site was further investigated under a confocal microscope, revealing changes in the tissue arrangement and morphology of epidermal cells in the mutant compared to the wild type (Figure 1i). Since VRN3 belongs to the PEBP family, we speculate that the PEBP protein may be involved in controlling plant epidermal cell patterning and differentiation, as observed in other organisms (Trakul et al., 2005). On the contrary, several plants exhibited only a vegetative growth phase and were genotypically characterized as triple knockouts with biallelic or homozygous mutations in all VRN3 copies (aaccdd) (Figure 1k,l). However, it remains to be seen whether the conserved role of the SPL/miR156 module in inflorescence development and reproductive phase transition in oat has been affected (Mehtab-Singh et al., 2024). In summary, we report the first successful CRISPR-Cas9-based gene editing in oat in three different genes – AsTLP8, AsVRN3 and AsVRN3D with high gene-editing efficiencies. The gene-edited plants for all the genes carried deletions and/or one base insertion. Analysis of VRN3 mutant T1 and T2 plants revealed bent leaves in single-copy knockouts (AACCdD), while an extended vegetative growth phase was seen in the T1 triple-knockout mutants (aaccdd), accentuating the important role of VRN3 in oat development. We are confident that this highly efficient oat gene-editing system will pave the way for a deeper molecular understanding of this healthy cereal, deciphering oat's functional genomics and creating genetic diversity at the cold spots of recombination in oat. This study was financially supported by the Prairie Oat Growers Association (POGA) through Agriculture Funding Consortium. We also acknowledge the support of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) program on Genome Editing for Food Security and Environmental Sustainability (GEFSES). We sincerely thank McGill University ECP3 Multi-Scale Imaging Facility, Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, Canada and especially Diksha Bhola (McGill University, Montreal) for her assistance with sample preparation and confocal microscopy imaging. The authors declare no competing interests. JS and M-S designed the experiments. M-S and CK designed the gRNA and constructs. M-S, CK and RK performed the oat transformations and tissue culture. M-S and CK conducted the molecular and phenotypic screening. M-S made the figures and wrote the manuscript, and all authors revised it. Figure S1 Confirmation of transgenic lines in the pJDTLP8 experiment. Figure S2 CAPS assay on T1 transgenic lines from JMV3-25F. Figure S3 Screening of Cas9-free plants in the JMV3-25F T1 generation. Figure S4 Sanger sequencing of VRN3 mutant lines. Figure S5 Targeted gene editing in the VRN3D gene. Methods S1 Material and Methods. Table S1 List of primers used in the study. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.108
Threshold uncertainty score0.987

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant Biotechnology JournalSame topicCRISPR and Genetic EngineeringFrench-language works237,207