Application of Artificial Intelligence in Marketing Strategy: A Case Study in the Retail Industry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The retail industry has undergone significant transformations due to integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) in marketing strategies. AI's ability to process vast amounts of data has revolutionized how businesses approach customer engagement, product management, and operational efficiency. This study explores how AI has enhanced decision-making in retail, particularly in optimizing dynamic pricing, product recommendations, and personalized marketing strategies. Retailers can analyze consumer behavior through AI-powered algorithms, offering targeted promotions and tailored product suggestions. This personalization increases customer satisfaction and fosters long-term loyalty. The study also highlights the role of AI in streamlining supply chain operations by predicting product demand, thus reducing the risk of stock shortages or excess inventory. The case study focuses on several large retail companies that have successfully implemented AI in their marketing strategies, resulting in improved customer experiences and significant cost savings. However, while AI offers numerous advantages, its implementation faces challenges such as technological investment, data management, and ethical concerns regarding customer privacy. These challenges necessitate a strong infrastructure and responsible data governance to ensure success. The findings of this research provide valuable insights into the practical applications of AI in the retail industry and its potential to offer a competitive edge. In conclusion, AI continues to play a pivotal role in enhancing marketing strategies, making retail operations more efficient, and improving customer satisfaction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".