<i>Kosmotogales</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Kos.mo.to.ga'les. N.L. fem. n. Kosmotoga , type genus of the order; L. fem. pl. n. suff. ‐ales , ending to denote an order; N.L. fem. pl. n. Kosmotogales , the order whose nomenclatural type is the genus Kosmotoga. The order Kosmotogales comprises mesophilic and thermophilic bacteria that are anaerobic heterotrophs. The cells are Gram‐stain‐negative, sheathed, short rods, or ovoid cocci. They produce hydrogen or hydrogen sulfide. Optimal growth occurs between 37 and 70°C. Some members of the order reduce thiosulfate and/or sulfur to sulfide. Known habitats are hydrothermal vents, marine sediments, crustal fluids, deep aquifers, oil reservoirs, hydrocarbon‐impacted sites, and anaerobic man‐made environments. The Kosmotogales order currently includes one family, the Kosmotogaceae , and thus the description is the same as that of the Kosmotogaceae family. DNA G + C content (mol%) : 36.4–42.5. Type genus : Kosmotoga DiPippo et al. 2009 VP (synonym: Thermococcoides Feng et al. 2010), emend. Nunoura et al. 2010. Taxonomic and Nomenclature Notes According to the List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN), the taxonomic status of the order Kosmotogales is: correct name (last update, February 2025) * . LPSN classification: Bacteria / Thermotogati / Thermotogota / Thermotogae / Kosmotogales The order Kosmotogales can also be recovered in the Genome Taxonomy Database (GTDB) as o__Petrotogales (version v220) ** . GTDB classification: d__Bacteria / p__Thermotogota / c__Thermotogae / o__Petrotogales * Meier‐Kolthoff et al. ( 2022 ). Nucleic Acids Res , 50 , D801 – D807 ; DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab902 ** Parks et al. ( 2022 ) Nucleic Acids Res , 50 , D785 – D794 ; DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab776
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.060 | 0.026 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".