MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410753350 · doi:10.1007/s10661-025-14074-7

Urinary concentrations of total and free bisphenol A and daily intake estimation in northern Mexican women

2025· article· en· W4410753350 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Belén Barajas, Ángel Mérida-Ortega, Lizbeth López-Carrillo, Mariano E. Cebrián

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Monitoring and Assessment · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
KeywordsBisphenol ATolerable daily intakeUrineAnimal sciencePopulationAcceptable daily intakeFood scienceChemistryMedicineBody weightInternal medicinePesticideBiologyEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bisphenol A (BPA) is a component of polycarbonates used to manufacture plastic reusable bottles and miscellaneous containers; it is a constituent of epoxy resins used for the internal coating of beverage cans. Humans are mainly exposed by ingesting contaminated food and beverages. Experimental and human studies reported diverse health problems associated with BPA. Our objectives were to measure free (FBPA) and total (TBPA) urinary levels, to estimate daily BPA intake, and to investigate sources of exposure in northern Mexican women. This study is a secondary cross-sectional analysis in controls (n = 201) participating in a population-based case-control study. BPA was extracted from urine using the Micro-QuEChERS method and determined by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. FBPA was detected in 88% of participants (geometric mean: 6.66; range: < LOD-48.83 ng/ml) whereas TBPA was detected in 98.5% (20.13; < LOD-37.15 ng/ml). TBPA estimated intake was 0.199 (0.007-4.26 μg/kg/bw/day), lower than the current American and Canadian tolerable daily intakes (TDI) of 50 and 25, respectively, but higher than the recently proposed TDIs by the European (0.0002 μg/kgbw/day) and German (0.2 μg/kgbw/day) authorities. Women having lower FBPA levels presented lower energy consumption, whereas those with higher TBPA concentrations were younger, had higher BMI, and higher energy intake. TBPA was positively associated with the estimated intake of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) but significantly negatively associated with cow's milk. The urinary concentrations of FBPA and TBPA indicated that women were widely exposed to BPA since their values were in the upper part of the range reported in other regions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.417

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Monitoring and AssessmentSame topicEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicalsFrench-language works237,207