Genomics‐led approach to drug testing in models of undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) is a rare cancer with limited systemic treatment options and poor outcomes. To seek novel therapeutic interventions, we undertook mutational analysis of 20 UPS patient tumours, four established UPS cell lines and three patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. Frequently mutated genes were uncommon; in contrast, copy number (CN) events were common with CN gain frequently observed at genes including JUN, EGFR and CDK6 and loss at WNT8B, RB1 and PTEN. Analysis of overlapping genomic changes between patient tumours and PDX models or cell lines revealed druggable events. A selected panel of drugs targeting these was analysed in in vitro UPS models demonstrating that the mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitor trametinib is synergistic in combination with the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitor infigratinib. This was further confirmed to be efficacious in an ex vivo tumour slice model. Taken together, our results demonstrate the rationale for utilising genomic data to identify drug classes targeting druggable events in low-prevalence cancers and indicate that trametinib alone or in combination with infigratinib should be further explored for clinical UPS management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".