MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4410759165 · doi:10.1101/2025.05.20.654782

Genome assembly and annotation of the naked mole rat <i>Heterocephalus glaber</i> reared in Japan

2025· preprint· en· W4410759165 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Kouhei Toga, Kaori Oka, Hiroyuki Tanaka, Takehiko Itoh, Atsushi Toyoda, Hidemasa Bono, Kyoko Miura

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicEvolution and Paleontology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCo-creation place formation support programInstitute of GeneticsJapan Society for the Promotion of Science
KeywordsAnnotationEvolutionary biologyBiologyGenomeZoologyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The naked mole rat (NMR, Heterocephalus glaber ) is a eusocial rodent that is native to northeastern Africa. NMRs exhibit extraordinary traits such as longevity, resistance to age-related decline, and remarkable hypoxia tolerance. Although the reference genome of this species has been determined because of its unique characteristics, the significance or role of intraspecific genomic variations remains unknown. In this study, we used PacBio long-read sequencing to generate a genome assembly of NMR reared in Japan. The assembled genome is 2.56 Gb. Benchmarking Universal Single–Copy Orthologs (BUSCO) revealed high completeness (95.2%). BRAKER3 estimated 26,714 protein-coding genes, and we successfully added functional annotations for 26,232 protein-coding genes using the functional annotation workflow. We identified 417 gene models that were previously undetectable in the reference genome of this species. We also identified structural and amino acid sequence variations between our assembly and the reference genome, suggesting the presence of intraspecific genomic variations. This new genomic resource could help uncover the molecular mechanisms underlying the behavioral and physiological traits of NMR.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicEvolution and Paleontology Studies→French-language works237,207→