Strategi Konservasi Daerah Aliran Sungai dan Wisata Air Terjun Berbasis Ekowisata di Kawasan Desa Manikyang, Kecamatan Selemadeg, Tabanan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Desa Manikyang merupakan salah satu desa yang terletak di Kabupaten Tabanan, Bali. Sama seperti wilayah lain di Bali, desa ini memiliki potensi daya tarik wisata alam yang dapat dikembangkan, yaitu wisata alam air terjun. Namun, potensi pariwisata yang ada ini juga memiliki sisi lain yang perlu mendapat perhatian. Dengan meningkatnya minat terhadap pariwisata yang ada, menimbulkan peningkatan minat terhadap investasi di desa ini, dengan kecenderungan pembangunan yang tidak teratur, khususnya pada Daerah Aliran Sungai (DAS). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menemukan potensi dan permasalahan, khususnya dari segi pembangunan yang terjadi di Desa Manikyang untuk selanjutnya dapat dirumuskan strategi konservasi terhadap Daerah Aliran Sungai (DAS). Adapun metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode kualitatif.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".