MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410769080 · doi:10.1088/1361-6501/addd3a

Cross-axis coupling suppression method based on TITO-SGPC for active magnetic compensation system

2025· article· en· W4410769080 on OpenAlexaff
Zhouqiang Yang, Peiling Cui, Yanbin Li, Ao Gong, Shiqiang Zheng

Bibliographic record

VenueMeasurement Science and Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMagnetic Bearings and Levitation Dynamics
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Education and Child Care
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsCompensation (psychology)Coupling (piping)Inductive couplingPhysicsMaterials scienceQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This study addresses the challenge of cross-axis magnetic field coupling in active magnetic compensation (AMC) system for magnetic shielding room (MSR), which limits control accuracy in weak magnetic environment. A three-input three-output (TITO) model of AMC system is constructed, and a simplified generalized predictive control (TITO-SGPC) is proposed, using attenuation sequence to reduce high-dimensional matrix operations. Experimental results show that TITO-SGPC suppresses cross-axis coupling magnetic field within 0.34 nT, achieving over 2.4 times higher suppression than traditional GPC. Compared with multiple-input multiple-output model predictive control (MIMO-MPC), the computational complexity is significantly reduced, the execution time and memory usage are reduced by 14 times and 2.2 times, respectively, and it has better disturbance suppression effect. This method overcomes the limitations of traditional decentralized control and computationally intensive MIMO methods by explicitly establishing a three-axis cross model, and uniquely balances coupling suppression and real-time performance. This study provides a modular and high-precision solution for biomagnetic measurement, enabling stable control in MSRs with different geometries and supporting advancements in weak magnetic measurement technology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.824
Threshold uncertainty score0.346

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMeasurement Science and TechnologySame topicMagnetic Bearings and Levitation DynamicsFrench-language works237,207