MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410779017 · doi:10.1093/jnen/nlaf061

Shift of DNA methylation class may occur on recurrence of pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma

2025· article· en· W4410779017 on OpenAlexaff
Gonzalo Hernandez Gamero, Evelina Miele, Andrea Mafficini, Lucrezia Ghione, Sara Patrizi, Lucia Pedace, Serena Ammendola, Valeria Barresi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity Hospital Foundation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPleomorphic xanthoastrocytomaDNA methylationBiologyMethylationMedicineDNAGeneticsCancer researchGlioblastomaAstrocytomaGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To the Editor: Pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma (PXA) is a circumscribed glioma predominantly located in the temporal lobe and characterized by large, often multinucleated, pleomorphic lipidized cells, spindle cells, and numerous eosinophilic granular bodies.1 Tumor cells exhibit at least focal positivity for glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and CD34 immunostaining and have a typical molecular profile including a BRAF mutation, or other MAPK pathway gene alterations, coupled with CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion.2,3 In addition, PXAs display a distinct DNA methylation profile that is useful for distinguishing morphologically similar tumors.4 According to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of central nervous system (CNS) tumors, PXAs are classified grade 2 or 3 based on mitotic index, with ≥2.5 mitoses/mm2 indicating grade 3.1 Progression from CNS WHO grade 2 to grade 3 has been associated with acquisition of TERT promoter (pTERT) mutations that represent significant prognostic indicators for PXAs.3,5,6 Indeed, the reported 5-year overall survival rates exceed 80% for CNS WHO grade 2 PXAs and are less than 60% for grade 3 PXAs.3,6

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neuropathology & Experimental NeurologySame topicGlioma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207