Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In chapter 2, Brant Venables analyzes monuments at military heritage sites, focusing on the Saratoga monuments to Polish engineer Thaddeus Kościuszko and Irish American Timothy Murphy and the Joseph Brant Mohawk Indian monument in Brantford, Ontario. Venables demonstrates how ethnic groups in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries were aware of the importance of challenging the authorized heritage discourse. These three groups raised money to create their own monuments when their role in history was being silenced. Venables examines how ethnic groups have engaged with nationalistic heritage narratives by emphasizing their own sacrifice, martial valor, and patriotism. He argues that each of these sites resists ethnic prejudice and works to integrate the ethnic groups into the mainstream American Revolutionary War heritage narrative or, in the case of the Joseph Brant monument, challenge the American portrayal of the Revolutionary War.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it