MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

First accounting of comprehensive radiotherapy life cycle assessment components in Africa.

2025· article· en· W4410795654 on OpenAlexaff
Phylicia Gawu, Charles Akoto-Aidoo, Isaac Washburn, Katie Lichter, Idalid Franco, Jerry J. Jaboin, Aba Anoa Scott, Meritxell Mallafré‐Larrosa, Alfredo Polo, Osama Mohamad, Surbhi Grover, Verna Vanderpuye, Shearwood McClelland

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
Canadian institutionsCape Breton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRadiation therapyAccountingInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

e23213 Background: Climate change is a pressing issue on the global stage. Recently a comprehensive lifecycle assessment (LCA) of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for cancer delineated the environmental and secondary health impacts of radiotherapy in the United States (US) (PMID 38821084). The continent of Africa is warming faster than any other in the world, leaving Africa to face the most disproportionate burden worldwide arising from climate change. Thus far, an LCA of EBRT has yet to be performed in Africa. We report initial pilot data on breast cancer patients treated in Africa with EBRT as a first step towards LCA analysis. As breast cancer is the most common indication for EBRT (and the most common cancer worldwide in women), it represents an optimal disease site to initiate LCA analysis. These findings represent the first assessment of the complete components of an LCA in Africa, using our experience from a Ghanaian hospital. Methods: Data collection was performed using the ISO 14040 and 14044 standards as a guide in accordance with PMID 38821084. The scope of the study was defined as one round of curative intent EBRT from initial consultation through delivery of the last fraction. LCA data components were comprised from breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant EBRT at Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital (KBTH), Ghana from 2021-2024. Data for a complete life cycle of adjuvant EBRT for breast cancer consisted of medical supplies, equipment, patient and staff travel, and building energy usage. Results: Ten breast cancer patients were assessed for data collection, of which six received 50 Gray (Gy) in 25 fractions; the remaining four received 40.05 Gy/15 fractions. Patients received EBRT via a cobalt machine (n = 9) or linear accelerator (n = 1). Medical supplies were grouped into reusable and single use items. For initial consultation, patients traveled median 13.9 km (8.6 mi), and median distance traveled by staff was 10.5 km (6.5 mi). CT simulation was used for planning; peer review and weekly on-treatment visits were performed by a Radiation Oncologist while pre-treatment quality assurance was completed by a medical physicist. During treatment, patients traveled median 15.3 km (9.5 mi), and radiation therapists traveled a median of 11.8 km (7.3 mi). Most associated with the radiation delivery process used public transit for travel. Clinic energy usage was in accordance with previously reported data (PMID: 37552912). Conclusions: Given the importance of radiotherapy in the treatment of cancer (involved in half of all cancers treated), an accurate LCA analysis of EBRT is essential for combating climate change worldwide. This study represents the first comprehensive accumulation of LCA data for the continent of Africa. Further analysis will involve assessment of these parameters to create an LCA which will have far reaching impact not only in breast cancer but in other disease sites both in Africa and worldwide.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.061

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.116
GPT teacher head0.523
Teacher spread0.407 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicAdvances in Oncology and Radiotherapy→French-language works237,207→