Movement behavior and activity budgets of female Canada lynx (<i>Lynx canadensis</i>) during the denning season
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Observing the behavior of a species during its offspring-rearing period can provide valuable insights that improve our understanding of the habitat conditions required to support successful reproduction. We used GPS location data collected during a period of high snowshoe hare abundance from 2018 to 2020 to examine den use and investigate the capacity of Canada lynx ( Lynx canadensis Kerr, 1792) mothers to access prey resources around their den sites throughout the stages of kit development. We tested the hypothesis that mothers would be heavily restricted in movement during the first 2 months after parturition, at which point their behavior would return to pre-parturient baseline. At this high-latitude study site (∼67°N), parturition occurred approximately 3 weeks later compared to lynx in the south (∼47°N). Additionally, home ranges and core areas of females were greatly reduced (3–11x) following parturition. These observations, along with an estimation of activity budgets, suggest that there are both spatial and temporal restrictions affecting movement away from den sites even after kits are greater than 2 months old, indicating that females are limited to accessing prey resources within a constrained area (i.e., ≤10 km2) while caring for dependent kits.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".