MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Dietary compounds and patterns associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) outcomes in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

2025· article· en· W4410805216 on OpenAlexaff
Edmond Rafie, Sebastian Hunter, Myriam Benlaïfaoui, Corentin Richard, Julie Malo, Catherine Lehoux-Dubois, Lisa Derosa, Wiam Belkaïd, Normand Blais, Marie Florescu, Mustapha Tehfé, Antoine Desîlets, Meriem Messaoudene, Valérie Marcil, Bertrand Routy, Arielle Elkrief

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLung cancerImmune systemOncologyInternal medicineCancerCancer researchImmune checkpointImmunotherapyImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

2567 Background: The gut microbiome is a modulator of ICI activity. Diet is among the most important factors influencing the gut microbiome. We previously showed that high fiber was not associated with outcome in NSCLC, in contrast to melanoma. However, the impact of dietary patterns and specific nutrients on ICI outcomes in NSCLC is unknown. Methods: At the CHUM Microbiome Centre, a nutritionist prospectively collected dietary history using a validated DHQ-II survey from 147 patients (pts) with advanced NSCLC treated with ICI alone or in combination with chemotherapy. Global dietary patterns and a systematic screen of 72 macro- and micronutrients (cut-offs defined by median) were examined for their association with progression-free survival (PFS) in univariable and multivariable cox-regression analyses. Associations between diet and immune-related adverse events (irAE) were examined. In 69 pts, shotgun metagenomic sequencing (WMS) was performed on fecal samples to determine differential abundance of bacteria using linear discriminant analyses, heatmaps, and MaAsLin2. Results: Median age was 68, 46% were male. Median follow-up was 13 months. Total caloric intake adjusted for basal metabolic rate (Mifflin-St Jeor equation using BMI and activity level) was not associated with PFS (p = 0.3). In univariable analyses, the following nutrients were associated with improved PFS: vitamin K (HR 0.62, p = 0.03), fat (HR 0.65, p = 0.04); while the following were associated with inferior PFS: starch (HR 1.61, p = 0.03), carbohydrates (HR 1.56, p = 0.04), sucrose (HR 1.62, p = 0.03), and iron (HR 1.7, p = 0.016). In a multivariable analysis examining all macro- and micronutrients and adjusting for BMI, vitamin K intake was significantly associated with improved PFS (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.37, 0.97, p = 0.04). Fat-based diets such as keto-like diet (high fat, low starch) was associated with improved PFS in univariable (HR, 0.47, p = 0.008) and multivariable analyses (HR 0.37, 95%CI 0.2, 0.68, p = 0.001). Compared to high starch diet, western diet (high fat, high starch) was associated with increased risk of any grade irAE (24% vs 54%, respectively, p = 0.01). WMS analyses revealed biologically relevant signals; fat-based diets were associated with enrichment of favorable commensal bacteria such as Ruminococcus lactaris , Butyricimonas faecihominis , Lachnospiraceae spp, with low fat associated with deleterious Veillonella atypica . Starch-based diets were associated with high Prevotella spp. Sucrose-enriched diets were enriched with Candidatus saccharibacteria , a known sucrose-fermenting bacteria. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate the importance of diet on ICI outcomes in NSCLC and WMS results suggest this is mediated by the gut microbiome. Diet is a modifiable lifestyle factor which may be targeted to improve ICI activity, meriting study in a randomized trial.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.344 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicCancer, Lipids, and MetabolismFrench-language works237,207