A phase 1 study of abemaciclib and niraparib as neoadjuvant therapy in hormone receptor positive and HER2 negative breast cancer.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
e12598 Background: Less than 20% of hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative breast cancer (HRBC) patients (pts) achieve pathologic complete response with current chemotherapy-based neoadjuvant treatment (NAT). There is a need to evaluate novel non-chemotherapy NAT regimens for HRBC. Abemaciclib is a cyclin dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor approved for the treatment of high-risk early stage and metastatic HRBC. Niraparib is a poly-ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) approved for the treatment of ovarian cancers. In preclinical data, treatment with abemaciclib sensitizes tumors to DNA damaging agents such as PARPi. This is a phase 1 study evaluating the combination of abemaciclib and niraparib as NAT for HRBC (NCT04481113). Methods: Pts aged ≥18 years with biopsy-proven stage I-III HRBC (ER ≥1%, PR ≥1%, HER2 non-amplified) planned for NAT were eligible for this study. Pts were treated according to a traditional 3+3 dose-escalation algorithm, with the starting dose level 1 (DL1) consisting of abemaciclib 150 mg PO BID and niraparib 100 mg PO daily, and DL2 of abemaciclib 150 mg PO BID and niraparib 200 mg PO daily. After 2 cycles, pts underwent repeat imaging and biopsy. Pts with response or stable disease (SD) received an additional 2 cycles of treatment, while pts with progressive disease (PD) were switched to standard of care chemotherapy. The primary endpoints were to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Results: A total of 8 pts were enrolled. Median age was 56 years, 6 were postmenopausal and 2 premenopausal. No pts had germline BRCA mutations. No DLTs occurred among 3 pts treated at DL1; however, 2 DLTs occurred at DL2, including one hematological DLT (dose delay >7 days due to myelosuppression) and a grade 5 cardiac adverse event (AE). Most AEs were grade 1-2, with the most common being gastrointestinal toxicities. The study was subsequently closed to accrual. The MTD was determined to be abemaciclib 150 mg PO BID and niraparib 100 mg PO daily. Among 5 pts who completed 2 cycles of abemaciclib and niraparib followed by disease evaluation, 2 achieved a partial response and 3 had SD by modified RECIST. There was no PD noted on study therapy. No locoregional or distant recurrences were noted at 3-year follow up. Serial biopsies on trial demonstrated tumor heterogeneity, and 2 pts with HER2-amplified disease on repeat biopsy were appropriately switched to NAT with HER2-based chemotherapy. Conclusions: This phase 1 study established abemaciclib 150 mg PO BID and niraparib 100 mg PO daily as the recommended phase 2 dose for this combination. Planned correlative studies are underway. Clinical trial information: NCT04481113 . Participant characteristics. Characteristic Number of Patients (N = 8) Race White (Caucasian) 8 ECOG 0 8 Clinical Stage I 2 II 6 Histology Ductal 8 Grade 2 2 3 6 HER2 IHC 1+ 7 2+ 1
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".