HSDSnake: a user-friendly SnakeMake pipeline for analysis of duplicate genes in eukaryotic genomes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SUMMARY: Gene duplication is a well-known driver of molecular evolution-it acts as a source of genetic novelty, thereby providing the raw substrate for organismal adaption. However, detecting different types of gene duplicates and comparing them in sequence datasets can be difficult. Existing tools can identify and classify gene duplicates that have arisen by various processes, but have limitations; for example, some do not have a user-friendly workflow and can include many intermediate steps requiring manual adjustments of parameters and/or are not maintained for the benefit of research community members. Here, we have developed HSDSnake, a user-friendly SnakeMake pipeline that can detect and classify gene duplications into five categories: dispersed, proximal, tandem, transposed, and whole genome. It also curates and evaluates the highly similar gene duplicates (HSDs) in each gene duplication category with reliance on both sequence similarity and conserved domains. Lastly, the detected gene duplicates can be visualized within a KEGG functional pathway framework and the substitution rates (Ka, Ks, and their Ka/Ks ratio) can be analyzed for all the duplicate gene pairs. We demonstrate HSDSnake's capabilities by analyzing two reference genomes directly downloaded from NCBI and provide detailed instructions for each step. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The HSDSnake pipeline uses SnakeMake and Conda to run and install dependencies. The distribution version is available online at GitHub: https://github.com/zx0223winner/HSDSnake and the archived version at Zenodo is https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15521945.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.046 | 0.033 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".