MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Predicting teratoma histology in postchemotherapy residual lesions of non-seminoma testicular cancer (NSTC) patients using integrated CT radiomics and circulating MicroRNAs modelling.

2025· article· en· W4410812321 on OpenAlexaff
Güliz Özgün, Neda Abdalvand, Gizem Özcan, Ka Mun Nip, Nastaran Khazamipour, Arman Rahmim, Robert H. Bell, Craig R. Nichols, Christian Kollmannsberger, Ren Yuan, Lucia Nappi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTesticular diseases and treatments
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeminomaMedicineTesticular cancerRadiomicsHistologyMature teratomaTeratomaPathologyCancerRadiologyOncologyInternal medicineChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

5035 Background: Chemotherapy is the primary treatment for metastatic NSTC, but patients often have residual masses afterward. Accurate non-invasive models are needed to predict the histology of these masses, guiding treatment and reserving surgery for those with teratoma. This study aims to enhance predictive accuracy by integrating CT-driven radiomics features with miRNAs 371 and 375 (miR371-375) to distinguish between teratoma and non-teratoma histologies in post-chemotherapy residual masses. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 52 patients with teratoma (n=56), fibrosis/necrosis (n=34), vGCT (n=11), and seminoma (n=10) lesions, divided into training (N=78) and test (N=33) cohorts with equal class distribution. Lesions included lymph nodes (n=68 retroperitoneum, n=11 mediastinum, n=4 pelvic, n=4 neck), lung (n=21), and brain (n=3) with a median size of 1.6 cm (Q1-Q3 interval=1.2-2.73 cm). Using 3D Slicer version 5.6.1, metastatic masses >1 cm (short axis) were segmented and radiomics features were extracted from venous phase CT images. Plasma miR371 and miR375 levels were measured by RT-PCR before resection. Four machine learning models evaluated the predictive value of radiomics alone (R-only) and combined with miR371/miR375 levels for teratoma histology, and the best performer, Cat Boosting (CB) method, is reported. Results: The analysis of datasets revealed a consistent pattern of superior performance in training sets compared to test sets across all metrics. The CB model R+371+375 dataset demonstrated the most robust overall performance, with the highest AUC values (0.96 [95% CI 0.88-1.0] for training, 0.83 [95% CI 0.68-0.98] for test) and a well-balanced sensitivity (0.71) and specificity (0.76) in the test set for predicting teratoma histology. R+375 followed closely with an AUC of 0.82 (95% CI 0.66-0.97). Conclusions: Combining miR 371 and 375 with CT-driven radiomics features improves the accuracy of classifying teratoma histology in metastatic NSTCs. This method can help characterize teratoma in residual metastatic disease, aiding treatment decisions and minimizing under or over-treatment risks. Further refinement, including the integration of clinical features, will be reported.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.436
Teacher spread0.360 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicTesticular diseases and treatments→French-language works237,207→