Les adultes en couple ont-ils une meilleure santé mentale durant la pandémie de COVID‑19?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Près de la moitié des adultes de 18 ans et plus au Canada disent se sentir « très souvent » ou « souvent » anxieux ou nerveux (47 %) ou encore tristes (45 %) depuis le début de la crise de COVID‑19, selon les données d’un sondage mené par l’Institut Vanier de la famille, l’Association d’études canadiennes et la firme Léger, recueillies du 9 au 12 avril 20201 (figure 1). Quatre adultes sur 10 affirment se sentir irritables (39 %) et environ le tiers disent éprouver des troubles du sommeil (35 %) et des sautes d’humeur (32 %) « très souvent » ou « souvent » depuis le début de la crise (figure 1). Mais les adultes qui sont actuellement en couple – qu’ils soient mariés ou en union libre – sont-ils aussi susceptibles que les personnes célibataires ou séparées, divorcées ou veuves de se sentir déstabilisés?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".